NEW F9100

[baggedregal]

WOW they look cool! so whats the word on them? are the posts still 1/4? but i like the fact they come of or the " side" Apposed to straight up and down! this bag would make it much easer to install in my regal, because my regal is a GM coil spring car;) so, how much more lift will it have over the brackers and a f9000? whats the burst psi? thanks for any help!

[darren@ridetech.com]

It has the same dimensions as the F9011.

[baggedregal]

ummm that didnt ever Answer my Question... port size, if it get the cars rear end taller than the f9000 with brackets. if there something that i can use i will be buying

[threeimpalas]

Since it has the same dimensions as the F9000, I would take that to mean the port size is the same as well as the amount of travel and load capacity.

[baggedregal]

i would hope it had more load Capacity because it advertises 2000lbs. i was looking to see if the car would still get as high as the old brackets and bags set up if not higher and still sit as low.
the stats on the f9100 bag: 2000#/min height 5.25" /install height 10" -10.5" / max height 15" / diameter 6.5"
the stats on the f9000 bag: 1500#/min height 4.5" /install height 9" -9.5/ max height 12" / diameter 5"

so it dont seems as there the same bags because of the load rating at 100psi and the diameter. i just want to know if there going to work right in my regal and give me the lift and drop i really want, so please whats the word on all this.

[baggedregal]

no news yet?:(

[darren@ridetech.com]

Not yet. It might have something to do with all this damn snow and ice.

[baggedregal]

darn this snow!

[baggedregal]

o yea, what do you think about the speed? Because the port on this new air bag has it on the side.... would that being on the side bare any restriction on the airflow?
Sorry im just getting jumpy about getting the air bags for the back RITE. ya know? It must sit as low as the 9000 with brackets and get at least as high! O-yea I was wondering about how well the new bag set in the spring perch, because from the looks it seams like it wouldn’t sit right because the perch has that bumped up part in the middle and a sunk in cup

[baggedregal]

DARREN!
from my own home work i belive that:
the 9000 with brackets is 6.25" tall at min. height and 13 3/4" at its max. height
the 9100 is 5.25" tall at min height (an added drop of 1" with the new bag) and 15" tall at max height. (theres 1 and a half inch height incress with the new bags).
BUT this is Assuming that the F9100 will sit flush in the upper spring perch, because there is that little bumped up part on the upper spring perch, its what the stock coil spring used to wrap around. so will the new bag sit flush into that upper perch, will that " lump" go inside the built on backet on the new bag??
please let me know! THANKS ALOT!

[darren@ridetech.com]

The bag will cup around the perch.

[baggedregal]

so thats a yes, it will sit flush? ok LAST question, with a straight 1/4npt to 1/2 tube fitting will it still be as fast as the f9000 with 1/2 line and a straight fitting? because once i know these factors ill know that they are what i want and buying. so are the bags in stock?

[darren@ridetech.com]

Still waiting on them to come back from Firestone. It will be a little faster than the F9000 since it will take less psi to pick up a given weight.

[baggedregal]

o thats cool, i didnt know it would be faster. my concern was with the port angle.;) cant wait to pick me a set up, when can i get me a set...a rough guess

[darren@ridetech.com]

Just as soon as I get them in.:D